Hasnunidah, Neni and Susilo, Herawati and Henie Irawati, Mimien and Suwono, Hadi (2022) Student conceptual and epistemic quality improvement argumentation with scaffolding on argument-driven inquiry. Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 6 (2). pp. 189-199. ISSN 2580-5525

Preview

Text 48183-155737-2-PB Neni UNY(sinta2)_penulis pertama.pdf Download (627kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the quality of students’ argumentation based on conceptual and epistemic aspects between learnings that implemented argument-driven inquiry (ADI) and argument-driven inquiry with scaff olding (ADIS) models. The data were collected through dialogic argumentation observation and audio-visual recordings. The data then were analyzed qualitatively. The research was carried out in a fi rst-year Mathematics and Science Education Department, Lampung University. The population of the study was all students of the Mathematics and Science Education Department, which was divided into 4 study programs. The 148 pre-service science teachers, which consisted of 67 participants in the ADI group and 81 participants in the ADIS group, were selected as the samples for the study. The results show that an ADIS model is inclined to have a higher potency in enhancing the achievement of students in terms of their quality of argumentation. It is believed that the ADIS model has appropriate learning stages needed by students so that it enhances their contribution for science teachers and lecturers to implement the ADI learning model.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	L Education > L Education (General)
Depositing User:	NENI HASNU
Date Deposited:	17 Apr 2023 09:26
Last Modified:	17 Apr 2023 09:26
URI:	http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/50611

Actions (login required)

View Item