Nurlaksana eko, Nurlaksana eko and Farida Ariyani, Farida (2022) Linguistic Politeness in Indonesia: Refusal Strategies among School-Aged Children in the Indonesian Context. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9 (8). pp. 38-46. ISSN 2364-5369

Preview	Text 3904-12083-1-PB.pdf - Published Version Download (874kB) | Preview
Preview	Image Cover.png - Cover Image Download (98kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Uji Turnitin_Linguistic Politeness in Indonesia_ Refusal Strategies among School-Aged Children in the Indonesian Context.pdf - Other Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Literature asserts that when children attempt to master a language, they display characteristics that are distinct from those of adults. They develop structures, patterns, and rules of their own language in this way. Moreover, a number of experts have proposed that in speech acts, speakers do not always intend to achieve personal objectives, i.e. to obtain something, but also attempt to maintain good relations with their speech partner and ensure interactions run smoothly. According to our knowledge, this topic among schoolchildren has received less attention recently. In order to gain a deeper understanding of the politeness strategies employed by school-aged children when conveying specific refusals to their speech partners, it was necessary to conduct this current study on this phenomenon. This study adopted a qualitative methodology. Forty children between the ages of six and ten provided speech samples. Observation and field notes were utilized to collect the data. The collected data were subsequently analyzed using an interactive analysis model that included data collection, data presentation, data reduction, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that children use politeness strategies to avoid offending their speech partner, to avoid losing face, and to keep the conversation going. The current findings also indicate that there are eight distinct categories of refusal strategies: (1) refusing by questioning; (2) refusing by delaying; (3) refusing by requesting an apology; (4) refusing by offering an alternative task; (5) refusing by involving a third party (6) refusing by suggesting a replacement; (7) refusing by stating conditional sentences; and (8) refusing by returning the command to the interlocutor. Also provided are implications and limitations for future research.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) > Prodi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan sastra Indonesia
Depositing User:	NURLAKSANA EKO RUSMINTO
Date Deposited:	09 Dec 2022 02:19
Last Modified:	09 Dec 2022 02:19
URI:	http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/47173

Actions (login required)

View Item