Maulina, Dina and Hasnunidah, Neni Kajian Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Pokok Animalia Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik Di SMA Dengan Peringkat Akreditasi Yang Berbeda. BIOEDUSAINS:Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains. ISSN 2598-7453

Preview

Text 3285-Article Text-42203-1-10-20220801 (7).pdf Download (705kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in the argumentation ability of students in high school with different accreditation ratings. The method used is a survey with an ex post facto research design and a sample selection techniqu using purposive sampling. The results of the student's argumentative ability test were analyzed statistically with the ANOVA test with a significance level of 5% and the data from interviews and teacher questionnaires were analyzed descriptively. The results showed that the argumentation ability of students in schools with accreditation ratings A was significantly different from those with accreditation ratings B and C. In addition, the argumentation ability of students in schools with accreditation rating B was significantly different from those with accreditation rating C. In conclusion, the average value of argumentation ability of students in high school with accreditation ratings of A, B and C on the subject matter of Animalia has a significant difference.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) > Prodi Pendidikan Biologi
Depositing User:	DINA MAULINA
Date Deposited:	29 Nov 2022 01:31
Last Modified:	29 Nov 2022 01:31
URI:	http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/46984

Actions (login required)

View Item