Hertanto, Hertanto (2010) PENDALAMAN DEMOKRASI INDONESIA DI ARAS LOKAL: Kasus Pilkada Lampung Pascareformasi. Working Paper. Laboratorium Ilmu, Politik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Andalas, Padang Sumatera Barat.

Working Paper.pdf

Download (3MB) | Preview
Official URL: http://issn.pdii.lipi.go.id/issn.cgi?daftar&129369...


ABSTRACT The dynamics of national politics after the reforms reflect the dynamics of local politics. After twelve years of reform, whether the transitional period has ended? After two periods of direct election (2005 & 2010), does local democracy in Lampung has been consolidated? Or in other words, whether the deepening of local democracy has been consolidated? Samuel P. Huntington (1991) had noted that, should the transition era ends after two times the regular democratic elections, in which elections deliver a democratic regime, which works on the basis of a democratic constitution as well. While Diamond (1999) mentions that the legitimacy of democratic consolidation is wide and strong as a “regime” which is considered correct and appropriate by society. Consolidation is characterized by habituation and behavioral norms and trust, where the political elite believe in the legitimacy of democracy and mutual respect for each other’s right to gain power based on the rule of law and constitution, as well as community organizations and political parties support – or at least not refuse – democracy, rule and state constitutional institutions, as well as more than 70% of public believe that democracy is the most appropriate system. Referring to the second expert opinion is the local political dynamics in Lampung post-reform era has been marked the end of the transitional period, namely the implementation of election in the second period of 2010. But these new dynamics to the extent deepening of procedural democracy, which is characterized by periodic change of political power through election. Lampung political dynamics have not reached the stage of substantial deepening of democracy, because it is still marked: a) the behavior of elites and political parties are still vulnerable to conflict and difficult to accept defeat in the election; b) conduct the election organizers (KPUD) are not independent; c) weak control function NGOs, and c) underdeveloped political culture of the participants at the community level. Keywords: Regional Head Election, Transition, Consolidation, Democracy

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (FISIP) > Prodi Ilmu Pemerintahan
Depositing User: HERTANTO
Date Deposited: 05 Mar 2020 09:14
Last Modified: 05 Mar 2020 09:14
URI: http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/18366

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item