Total views : 117

Learning Community-based Model in the Context of Teacher-parent Partnerships: A Novel Model for Preparing Post-disaster Recovery and Resilience for Students in Risk Disaster Areas in Indonesia

Affiliations

  • Department of Math and Science Education, University of Lampung, Indonesia
  • Department of Language and Art Education, University of Lampung, Indonesia
  • Department of Educational Sciences, University of Lampung, Indonesia
  • Muhammadiyah University of Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


Objectives: Current research is intended to propose a new model for preparedness post-disaster awareness based on learning community approach, namely “Learning Community Cycle Model for Disaster Awareness (LC2MDA)”. Methods/ Statistical Analysis: This learning community model was developed by using the research and development method in Lampung province, Indonesia, specifically in the Lampung Barat and the Pesisir Barat districts. The subjects of the research were the students, parents, and teachers. Students were treated as the object for the LC2MDA model, the teachers had a role in facilitating the students achieving the expected set of competence, while the parents took part in giving inputs and considerations to for the school and teachers in integrating disaster literacy into the local curriculum and played a role as active observers of the teaching learning process. Findings: This paper highlights an adapted learning community model. Based on the result of qualitative investigations, it was found that the learning community approach was potentially effective in facilitating students’ disaster literacy, attitudes, and skills for preparing post-disaster recovery and resilience. The role shift needed to embed and to extend the optimalization of teacher-parents involvement in the school programs which was achieved through positive supports and commitment to engage in school development program. Application: LC2MDA can be considered as an effective model to recover the post-disaster psychological condition of the students and form the students’ psychological resilience to the possibility of the aftershocks.

Keywords

Disaster Education, Learning Community, Recovery, Resilience

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 125)

References


  • Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction (GAR) Indonesia-risk profile. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR); 2009. p. 1–207.
  • Hayashi T. Disaster prevention education in Merapi Volcano Area Primary Schools: Focusing on student’s perception and teacher’s performance. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2014; 20:668–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.080.
  • Hayashi T. Educational merits of lecturing and discussion methodsin teaching disaster prevention: Toward improvement of student’s knowledge, attitude, and behavior in Merapi Volcano area primary schools. Journal of Disaster Research. 2014; 9(5):870–8. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2014.p0870.
  • Sugimoto M, Iemura H, Shaw R. Tsunami height poles and disaster awareness: Memory, education and awareness of disaster on the reconstruction for resilient city in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. 2010; 19(5):527–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011091869.
  • UNDP United Nations Development Programmed -Indonesia. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.id.undp.org/content/dam/indonesia/docs/ AR2013/AR%20UNDP%202012-2013_high-res.
  • pdf?download.
  • Gwee Q, Takeuchi Y, Jet-Chau W, Shaw R. Disaster education system in Yunlin County, Taiwan. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management. 2011; 3(2):189– 204. https://doi.org/10.3850/S1793924011000745.
  • Kanegae H. Effectiveness of disaster-based school program on students’ earthquake-preparedness. Journal of Disaster Research. 2013; 5(8):1009–17.
  • Soffer Y, Goldberg A, Avisar‐Shohat G, Cohen R, Bar‐Dayan Y. The effect of different educational interventions on schoolchildren’s knowledge of earthquake protective behavior in Israel. Disasters. 2010; 34(1):205–13.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01125.x. PMid:19793325
  • Ronan KR, Crellin K, Johnston DM. Correlates of hazards education for youth: A replication study. Nat Hazards. 2010; 53(3):503–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-0099444-6.
  • Chen LC, Liu YC, Chan KC. Integrated community-based disaster management program in Taiwan: A case study of Shang-an village. Natural Hazards. 2006; 37(1–2):209–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-4669-5.
  • Smith K. Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Routledge; 1993. p. 1–306.
  • Mulyasari F, Takeuchi Y, Shaw R. Implementation tools for disaster education. Community Environment and Disaster Risk Management. 2011; 7:137–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-7262(2011)0000007013.
  • Rafliana I. Disaster education in Indonesia: Learning how it works from six years of experience after Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004. Journal of Disaster Research. 2004; 7(1):83–91. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2012.p0083.
  • ThiMyThi T, Shaw R. Building disaster resilience from school level: A case study in Thua Thien Hue Province, Central Vietnam. Journal of Disaster Research. 2013; 8(1):206–6.
  • Paton D, Sagala S, Okada N, Jang L, Burgelt PT, Gregg CE. Making sense of natural hazard mitigation: Personal, social and cultural influences. Environmental Hazards. 2010; 9(2):183–96. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2010.0039.
  • Uitto JI, Shaw R. Adaptation to changing climate: Promoting community-based approaches in the developing countries. SANSAI: An Environmental Journal for the Global Community. 2006; 1:93–107.
  • Ayers JM, Huq S. Supporting adaptation to climate change: What role for official development assistance?Development Policy Review. 2009; 27(6):675–92.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00465.x.
  • Murata F, Imamura K, Katoh Y, Kawata S, Takayama T.
  • Tsunami: To survive from tsunami. Singapore: World Scientific; 2010.
  • Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters.Global Environmental Change. 2008; 18(4):598–606.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013.
  • Sweetland SR, Hoy WK. School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model ofstudent achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. 2006; 36(5):703–29.
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610021969173.
  • Fikriani D, Bone J. Children’s participation in disaster risk reduction as curriculum. New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education. 2014; 17:35–50.
  • Rahman B, Abdurrahman A, Kadaryanto B, Rusminto NE. Teacher-based scaffolding as a teacher professional development program in Indonesia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2015; 40(11):1–13. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.4.
  • Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR. Action research. Educational Research: An Introduction. Pearson Education. Inc. Boston; 2003. p. 578–97.
  • Thiagarajan S. Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook; 1974.
  • Beecham S, Hall T, Rainer A. Defining a requirements process improvement model. Software Quality Journal. 2005; 13(3):247–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-005-1752-9.
  • Clinton J. Resilience and recovery. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality. 2008; 13(3):213–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13644360802236474.
  • Abdurrahman, Tarmini W, Kadaryanto B, Development of meta cognitive skills-oriented learning model to enhance literate and awareness character for elementary student at risk area. Proceeding of National Seminar of Science Education; 2012.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.