THE COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN TEACHER’S DIRECT AND INDIRECT FEEDBACK TECHNIQUES IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti apakah i) teknik teacher’s direct feedback dapat meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa, ii) teknik teacher’s indirect feedback dapat meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa, dan iii) apakah ada perbedaan pada kemampuan menulis siswa antara siswa di kelas teacher’s direct dan kelas indirect feedback. Penelitian ini termasuk kedalam penelitian kuantitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 30 siswa kelas X MIPA 1 dan X MIPA 2 SMAN 1 Kotagajah. Tes menulis digunakan sebagai alat untuk pengambilan data. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa i) Teknik teacher’s direct feedback dapat meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa, ii) Teknik teacher’s indirect feedback dapat meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa, dan iii) terdapat perbedaan pada kemampuan menullis siswa antara siswa di kelas teacher’s direct dan kelas indirect feedbacks. Hasil dari penelitian ini menganjurkan bahwa teknik teacher’s direct dan indirect feedbacks ini dapat diaplikasikan sebagai strategi alternatif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa.
This study was aimed to find whether i) teacher’s direct feedback technique improves the students’ writing achievement, ii) teacher’s indirect feedback technique improves the students’ writing achievement, and iii) there is any difference of students’ writing between students in teacher’s direct and indirect feedback classes. The research was quantitative. The subjects were 30 students of X MIPA 1 and X MIPA 2 of SMAN 1 Kotagajah. The writing test was administrated as the instrument of the research. The results show that i) the teacher’s direct feedback technique improves the students’ writing achievement, ii) the teacher’s indirect feedback technique improves students’ writing achievement, and iii) there is a statistically significant difference of the students’ writing achievement between students in teacher’s direct and indirect feedback classes. The findings suggest that teacher’s direct and indirect feedback techniques can be applied as alternative strategies to improve students’ writing ability.
Keywords : Writing, Teacher’s Direct Feedback, Teacher’s Indirect Feedback.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elshirbini, I.I., & Elashri, A.F. (2013). The impact of the direct teacher feedback strategy on the EFL secondary stage students’ writing performance. Mansoura University.
Erel, S., & Bulut, D. (2007). Error treatment in L2 writing: A comparative study of direct and indirect coded feedback in Turkish context. Social Sciences Institute, 22(1), 397-415.
Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language students’ writing. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
Harmer, J. (1998). The practice of english language teaching. Essex: Longman.
Heaton, J. B. (1991). Writing English Language Testing. New York: Longman, Inc.
Jamalinesari, A. (2015). The effects of teacher’s written direct vs. indirect feedback on students’ writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192(1), 166-123.
Makino, T.Y. (1993). Learner self-correction in EFL written composition. ELT Journal, 47(4): 337-341.
Pramana, G. J. (2015). Improving students’ descriptive text writing ability through teacher’s indirect feedback at the first year of MA Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung. Lampung. Universitas Lampung.
Santi, D. (2007). The effect of teacher’s feedback on 2005 english major student writing at Halu Oleo University. Kendari.
Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 148-156.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching practice and theory. Cambridge Teacher Training and Development. London: Cambridge University Press
Utami, U.T. (2012). Improving students’ writing skill through teacher’s direct feedback in SMAN 1 Jogonalan. Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 U-JET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.