This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Close this notification
NOTICE: Ensuring subscriber access to content on IOPscience throughout the coronavirus outbreak - see our remote access guidelines.
Find article
Paper • The following article is Open access

Evaluation of the Success of Programs and Strategy for Sustainable Coastal Community Development in Tanggamus Regency

, , , , and

Published 1 February 2020 • Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
, ,

Download Article PDF

35 Total downloads

Share this article

Article information
Author e-mails

helviyanfika@yahoo.co.id

Author affiliations

1 Study Program of Agricultural Extension, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, 35145 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

2 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, 35145 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Citation

H Yanfika et al 2020 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1467 012026

Create citation alert

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012026

Buy this article in print

Journal RSS feed

1742-6596/1467/1/012026

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the success of the KUB program and the coastal community development strategy in Tanggamus Regency. The research was conducted in Kota Agung Sub-district, Tanggamus Regency, Lampung Province, which is a fishery center in Tanggamus Regency. The study was conducted in July and August 2019. The research method uses a quantitative approach to the survey method. Qualitative data was collected to support research studies through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGD), and field observations. The data collected will be analyzed using qualitative descriptive approaches. The results showed that the capture fisheries program was generally good and following the needs of fishermen to increase catches. Nevertheless, in the implementation of activities in the joint business groups still need to be improved access, because program assistance is still felt by some individuals. Besides, increased communication between group members strengthens joint business groups is needed. The strategy of developing coastal communities in increase independence is through training in processing fishery products, fostering entrepreneurship, policies to limiting fishery products from outside the region, increasing public awareness about of maintaining the cleanliness of the sea and the environment and promote cooperation with stakeholders to support the sustainability of fisheries businesses.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References

  • [1]
    Tampubolon D. 2012 Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pesisir di Kabukpaten Kepulauan Meranti J. SOROT 8 153-161

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2]
    Meirinawati, Prabawati I. and Pradana G. W. 2018 Strategy community development based on local resources J. Phys. Conf. Ser 953 1-5

    Google Scholar

  • [3]
    Adiwibowo S. 2007 Ekologi Manusia. pdf (Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor)

    Google Scholar

  • [4]
    Mutolib A., Yonariza, Mahdi and Ismono H. 2016 Gender Inequality and the Oppression of Women within Minangkabau Matrilineal Society: A Case Study of the Management of Ulayat Forest Land in Nagari Bonjol, Dharmasraya District, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia Asian women 32 23-49

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]
    Kurniawan S. and Suratman B. 2018 Bertani Padi Bagi Orang Melayu Sambas: Kearifan Lokal, Nilai-Nilai Islam, dan Character Building Anal. J. Stud. Keislam 18 191

    Google Scholar

  • [6]
    Tampubolon J., Sugihen B. G., Samet M., Susanto D. and Sumardjo S. 2006 Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Melalui Pendekatan Kelompok (Kasus Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin melalui Pendekatan Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBE)) J. Penyul.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7]
    Listiana I., Efendi I., Mutolib A. and Rahmat A. 2019 The behavior of Extension Agents in Utilizing Information and Technology to Improve the Performance of Extension Agents in Lampung Province J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1155 1-10

    Google Scholar

  • [8]
    Chaudhuri S. 2015 Urban poor, economic opportunities and sustainable development through traditional knowledge and practices Glob. Bioeth. 26 86-93

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]
    Yanfika H., Listiana I., Mutolib A. and Rahmat A. 2019 Linkages between Extension Institutions and Stakeholders in the Development of Sustainable Fisheries in Lampung Province J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1155 1-6

    Google Scholar

  • [10]
    Rahmat A. and Mutolib A. 2016 Comparison of air temperature under global climate change issue in Gifu City and Ogaki City, Japan Indones. J. Sci. Technol. 1 37-46

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]
    Hiariey L. S. and Romeon N. R. 2017 Penguatan Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUB) Perikanan Tangkap (Studi Kasus Desa Latuhalat, Kota Ambon, Provinsi Maluku) J. Mat. Saint, dan Teknol. 18 121-130

    Google Scholar

  • [12]
    Bevan M. T. 2014 A method of phenomenological interviewing Qual. Health Res. 24 136-144

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]
    Kim H., Sefcik J. S. and Bradway C. 2017 Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review Res. Nurs. Heal. 40 23-42

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]
    Huberman A. and Miles M. 2012 Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research The Qualitative Researcher's Companion

    Google Scholar

  • [15]
    Roopa S. and Rani M. 2012 Questionnaire Designing for a Survey J. Indian Orthod. Soc. 46 273-277

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16]
    Fossey E., Harvey C., McDermott F. and Davidson L. 2002 Understanding and evaluating qualitative research Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 36 717-732

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]
    Ponto 2015 Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research J. Adv. Pract. Oncol. 6 168-171

    Google Scholar

  • [18]
    Yildirim A., Celikten M., Desiatov T. and Lodatko Y. 2019 The Analysis of Teachers' Cyber Bullying, Cyber Victimization and Cyber Bullying Sensitivity Based On Various Variables Eur. J. Educ. Res. 8 1029-1038

    Google Scholar

  • [19]
    Acocella I. 2012 The focus groups in social research: Advantages and disadvantages Qual. Quant. 46 1125-1136

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]
    Dilshad R. M. and Latif M. I. 2013 Focus Group Interview as a Tool for Qualitative Research: An Analysis Pakistan J. Soc. Sci. 33 191-198

    Google Scholar

  • [21]
    Yildiz H. and Gokce T. 2018 The Development Process of a Mathematic Teacher's Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Eur. J. Educ. Res. 7 11

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]
    Matthew M., B, H. A M and Johnny S. 2014 Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook 3 (Thousand Oaks, Califorinia: SAGE Publications)

    Google Scholar

  • [23]
    Huberman A. and Miles M. 2012 The Qualitative Researcher's Companion (Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications) The Qualitative Researcher's Companion 37-64

    Google Scholar

  • [24]
    Mutolib A., Yonariza, Mahdi and Ismono H. 2017 Forest ownership conflict between a local community and the state: A case study in Dharmasraya, Indonesia J. Trop. For. Sci. 29 163-171

    Google Scholar

  • [25]
    Gurel E. 2017 SWOT Analysis: A Theoritical Review J. Int. Soc. Res. 10 994-1006

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26]
    Kotler P. and Keller K. L. 2009 Marketing management 13 (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall) 14 ed.

    Google Scholar

  • [27]
    Chung J. et al 2015 A study on the relationships between age, work experience, cognition, and work ability in older employees working in heavy industry J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 27 155-157

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28]
    Von Bonsdorff M. E., Zhou L., Wang M., Vanhala S., Von Bonsdorff M. B. and Rantanen T. 2018 Employee Age and Company Performance: An Integrated Model of Aging and Human Resource Management Practices J. Manage. 44 3124-3150

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]
    Shehada M. and Abu Dawood W. 2017 Measuring the Relationship between Age and Productivity: A case Study of Orange West Sales Department Am. Based Res. J. 6 35-41

    Google Scholar

  • [30]
    Mardikanto T. 1993 Penyuluhan Pembangunan Pertanian (Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press)

    Google Scholar

  • [31]
    Chesoli C. W. 2013 Types of capacity building activities for improved market participation by farmer groups in turbo, Kenya J. Emerg. Trends Econ. Manag. Sci. 4 377-380

    Google Scholar

  • [32]
    Hikmah N., Kurnia M. and Amir F. 2016 Pemanfaatan Teknologi Alat Bantu Rumpon Untuk Fads Technology Utilization for Fish Capture J. IPTEKS PSP 3 455-468 January

    Google Scholar

  • [33]
    Hikmayani Y. 2013 Permasalahan Yang Dihadapi Masyarakat Dan Peran KIMBis Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Kota Tegal Bul. Ilm. Mar. Sos. Ekon. Kelaut. dan Perikan. 8 67

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34]
    Osita I., Onyebuchi I. and Nzekwe J. 2014 Organization's stability and productivity: the role of SWOT analysis an acronym for strength, weakness, opportunities and threat Int. J. Innov. Appl. Res. 2 23-32

    Google Scholar

Export references: BibTeX RIS