This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Close this notification
Find article
Paper • The following article is OPEN ACCESS

Identification of eroded sediment layer thickness and depth of Mahakam River at Tenggarong Bridge Area, Kutai Kartanegara East Kalimantan using Ground Penetrating Radar Method

, and

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
, ,

Download Article PDF

33 Total downloads

Share this article

Article information
Author e-mails

syamsurijal.rasimeng@eng.unila.ac.id

Author affiliations

1 Geophysics Engineering Department, University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia

2 Doctoral Programme of Environmental Sciences, University of Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia

3 Department of Physics, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia

Citation

S Rasimeng et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 279 012040

Create citation alert

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/279/1/012040

Buy this article in print

Journal RSS feed

1755-1315/279/1/012040

Abstract

GPR measurements of lines are two lines intersect under the bridge of Tenggarong (southwest to northeast) along the 377 meters (segment-1 Line04) and 457 meters (Line03) and the other is Southeast to Northwest along the 533 meters (segment-2 Line04) with a starting point It is located on the side of the Mahakam River (Southern) to the West of Kumala island. and there is one track in this area, which is to the northeast to the southwest along the south side of the Mahakam River (Line02) with the length of line is 780 meters. This research used the AKULA-9000C, 100 MHz antenna frequencies, and in time mode. The purpose of this research is to know the depth of the bottom of the Mahakam River, and the thickness of sediments eroded around the bridge of Tenggarong. GPR data processing using the ReflexW software ver. 8.5 through static correction, subtract-mean (dewow) filter, gain, background removal, band-pass filters, and fk-filter. To convert two-way time of electromagnetic wave propagation data to depth units, we use velocity adaptation methods by selecting velocity value each layer anomaly. Cross sections of the line from line02 and Line03 showed that the average thickness of the layer of sediment erosion over 15 meters and depth variation ofthe river was 10 to 40 meters. The shallow depth is under the Tenggarong Bridge (10m). In addition, on Line04 shows the deepest depth of the Mahakam River is 35 meters, located in the middle of Line04 or the center of Mahakam river flow.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

cc-by

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References

  • [1]
    Forest Watch Indonesia 2016 Intip Hutan Indonesia: Menyelamatkan Hutan, Menyelematkan Bumi http://fwi.or.id/ (access on Oct 25th, 2018)

    Google Scholar

  • [2]
    Allen G P and Mercier F 1994 Proc. of the Indonesian Petroleum Association 261-273

    Google Scholar

  • [3]
    Lambert B 2003 Micropaleontological investigations in the modern Mahakam delta, East Kalimantan (Indonesia) Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology–Article 2003/02 (CG2003_A02_BL)

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4]
    Husein S and Lambiase J J 2005 Proc. of the Indonesian Petroleum Association 367-379

    Google Scholar

  • [5]
    Roberts H H and Sydow J 1996 Proc. of the Indonesian Petroleum Association Twenty-Fifth Silver Anniversary Convention 147-161

    Google Scholar

  • [6]
    Hidayati D, Yogaswara H and Djohan E 2006 Partisipasi Stakeholders Dalam Konsolidasi Tanah Delta Mahakam: Alternatif Penataan Kawasan unpublished

    Google Scholar

  • [7]
    Sambuelli L, Calzoni C and Pesenti M 2009 GEOPHYSICS 74 B95-B104

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8]
    McLaren P 1981 Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 51 611-624

    Google Scholar

  • [9]
    Pettijohn F J 1975 Sedimentary Rocks 3 (New York, Evanston, San fransisco, and London: Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc.) 628

    Google Scholar

  • [10]
    Daniels D J 2004 Ground Penetrating Radar 2 (IET)

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]
    Brito G L M, Coutinho A P, Cabral J J S P, Neto S M S, Antonino A C D, Cirilo J A, Braga R A P and Filho S L S 2018 Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos Brazilian Journal of Water Resources

    Google Scholar

  • [12]
    Bungey J H 2004 Constr Build Mater 18 1-8

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]
    Barrile V and Paccinotti R 2005 NDT&E Int 38 596-604

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]
    Chang C W, Lin C H and Lien H S 2009 Constr Build Mater 23 1057-1063

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15]
    Sukma A M, Krisningrum N N, Assyiffa T N, Alami F, Rasimeng S and Alhadi A 2018 The 43rd Annual Scientific Meeting of Indonesian Geophysicists Association (Semarang) Ground penetrating radar (GPR) for identifying the depth of spun pile gas station at Batam

    Google Scholar

  • [16]
    Evans R, Frost M, Stonecliffe-Jones M and Dixon N 2006 Proc Inst Civ Eng Munic Eng 159 105-111

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]
    Huber Emanuel and Huggenberger Peter 2016 Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20 2035-2046

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]
    Beres M and Haeni F P 1991 Ground Water 29 375-386

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]
    Neal A 2004 Earth-Sci Rev 66 261-330

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]
    Mellet J S 1995 Appl Geophys 33 157-166

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21]
    Pyke K, Eyuboglu S, Daniels J J and Vendl M 2008 J Environ Eng Geophys 13 335-342

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]
    Gerhards H, Wollschläger U, Yu Q, Schiwek P, Pan X and Roth K 2008 Geophysics 73 J15-J23

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]
    Birchak J R, Gardner C, Hipp J E and Victor J M 1974 Proc. IEEE 62 93-98

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24]
    Akula 2018 9000 Radar Control Units www.geoscanners.com. Sweden

    Google Scholar

  • [25]
    Arcone S A, Finnegan D and Laatsch J E 2006 Bathymetric and subbottom surveying in shallow and conductive water Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar

    Google Scholar

  • [26]
    Huisman J A, Hubbard S S, Redman J D and Annan A P 2003 Vadose Zone J 2 476-491

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27]
    Sheng Huoo N, Ching-Kuan C and Hong-Ming L 2002 Application of ground penetrating radar on the void-detection in levee Proc. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng.

    Google Scholar

  • [28]
    Saarenketo T 1998 J Appl Geophys 40 73-88

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29]
    Ishida T and Makino T 1999 J Colloid Interface Sci 212

    Google Scholar

  • [30]
    Santamarina J C, Klein K A and Fam M A 2001 Soils and Waves: Particulate Materials Behavior, Characterization and Process Monitoring (New York: John Wiley and Sons)

    Google Scholar

  • [31]
    Bittelli M, Salvatorelli F and Rossi Pisa P 2008 Geoderma 143 133-142

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32]
    Di Prinzio M, Bittelli M, Castellarin A and Pisa P R 2010 J Appl Geophys 71 53-61

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Export references: BibTeX RIS